stellar_muddle: (Default)
It would appear the politacal appointee who wanted to insert "theory" after every Big Bang mention and stiffle Climate change discussion, lied on his resume and has been removed from his public liason position at NASA.
A Young Bush Appointee Resigns His Post at NASA (NYT)
Deutsch resigns from NASA!
(Bad Astronomy)
George Deutsch Did Not Graduate From Texas A & M University (The Scientific Activist)

We wont mention that apparently certain PR elements had wanted a phrasing change to "stellar evolution" too...

mutter mutter fuckwits mutter mutter mess with my science mutter mutter

Lets hope their job requirements for the next NASA public relations person actually include a (prefereably astronomical) science backround component. But given it will still be a political appointee...don't hold your breath.
stellar_muddle: (Default)
Outrage at attacks on NASA science Bad Astronomy Blog run by Phil Plait, an astronomer and sceptic who runs the Bad Astronomy website. Found via [livejournal.com profile] vonstrassburg's Slashdot feed.

Quoting from bits of the NYT article

The Big Bang is “not proven fact; it is opinion,” Mr. Deutsch wrote, adding, “It is not NASA’s place, nor should it be to make a declaration such as this about the existence of the universe that discounts intelligent design by a creator.”
[snip]
The Deutsch memo was provided by an official at NASA headquarters who said he was upset with the effort to justify changes to descriptions of science by referring to politically charged issues like intelligent design. Senior NASA officials did not dispute the message's authenticity.

Mr. Wild declined to be interviewed; Mr. Deutsch did not respond to e-mail or phone messages. On Friday evening, repeated queries were made to the White House about how a young presidential appointee with no science background came to be supervising Web presentations on cosmology and interview requests to senior NASA scientists.

The only response came from Donald Tighe of the White House Office of Science and Technology Policy. "Science is respected and protected and highly valued by the administration," he said.


The censorship of climate research results (what two thirds of the NYT article is discussing), whatever conclusion they support, is also verging on the criminal.

Profile

stellar_muddle: (Default)
stellar_muddle

January 2016

S M T W T F S
     12
3 456789
10111213141516
17181920212223
24252627282930
31      

Syndicate

RSS Atom

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jul. 20th, 2025 07:13 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios